Friday, February 21, 2020

Using NOVA Labs Evolution Lab

Last week in Analytical Biology (Honors Bio), we began our Comparative Reproduction Unit. To get us doing some comparing, we did Mission 1 and Mission 2 of the NOVA Labs Evolution Lab. After watching a brief video and answering a few questions, students are off to building phylogenetic trees based on similarities and differences between different organisms.


The kids loved it, as it is set up more like a game than studying. I like that you can try out your tree and if it doesn't work (if dots fall off of the tree), you can readjust and try again. You can also click on the magnifying glass icon to get more information about the organisms you are trying to compare. This information is helpful for knowing how to put the tree together.


Although I only asked them to complete the first two missions, many students went on to the other missions--even though they covered topics that we haven't seen yet, namely DNA similarities to build trees. One student asked permission if she could complete all of the missions on her own. Of course!


One of the relationships they were surprised about was that a fungus was more closely related to animals than to plants. It led to some discussions about heterotrophs and autotrophs.


I set up a classroom in mypbslearningmedia.org and then could push out the assignment to my students through Google Classroom. The process isn't perfectly smooth, but all of my students found their way into the missions without too much help, and several students helped others to navigate their way in.


As students get further into the trees, they get more complicated. There is certainly some frustration as the trees get more difficult, but one student will figure it out and their celebration of figuring it out tends to encourage others to press on.


There are questions throughout to keep students focused on the learning that's happening. it also gives them an introduction to cladograms that they will have to interpret on the Regents exam in June, so that's another plus for this activity.



Pushing the Limits of the Electrophoresis Lab



For the second year now, we've been using Bio-Rad's forensic electrophoresis lab. My schedule is different than last year, so when I could prep for this lab had to be shifted. I poured the agarose gels on the Thursday of the week before we were going to do the lab and put them in the fridge with some buffer. I had planned to run the gels that Tuesday, so the gels would only be 5 days old.



I emailed the company about the feasibility of rehydrating the DNA samples and aliquoting them on Friday because I wasn't confident that I'd have enough time to do it Monday morning before we did the restriction digest. A Bio-Rad scientist confirmed that it would be fine.



Monday morning my students did the restriction enzyme digest. An hour later, we received the announcement that school would be closed on Tuesday because of how many students were out sick with the flu. On Tuesdays and Thursdays, we have 80 minutes for class, but on Wednesdays we only have 38 minutes. I knew 38 minutes wasn't long enough, so I called Bio-Rad and asked if our DNA would still be "runnable" if we waiting until Thursday. They confirmed that yes, it was possible and we could stick the samples in the freezer to be even safer.



Wouldn't you know it, we had a snow day on Thursday! Both Friday and Monday were only 38 minute periods for us, so I decided we'd just put it off until the next Tuesday. I figured even if it was a bust, I have pictures of successful gels and at least they would have the experience of filing the wells and watching the dye move through the gels as they were in the chambers.



The next Tuesday, 13 days after I had poured the gels and 9 days after we had done the restriction enzyme digest we ran our crime scene samples.



Although I followed Bio Rad's directions for running the gels in 20 minutes, I let them go for 45 minutes since the year before the bands hadn't moved very far. I think it's my power source. Anyway, by then my students had left for their next class, so I stained and destained their gels. I saw nothing right after. I figured the time lag was too long and I'd just show them pictures. I didn't toss the gels though since I wanted my students to see them anyway. I happened to take a look about 30 minutes later, and viola! There were the DNA bands. They weren't fabulous, but I think it has more to do with trying to run them rapidly. Next year I'll try the agarose concentrations for the longer running time and see how that goes.


Thursday, February 6, 2020

Hands-On Law of Sines and Cosines



I love when teachers freely share ideas and materials online. Although I appreciate the work available in TPT (I use All Things Algebra's Precalculus curriculum and love it), freely shared resources are my favorite.


We were working on the Law of Sines and the Law of Cosines in class today and I was trying to decide what we would do for practice. This class is flipped, so my students had already done the notes.  Even doing a jigsaw with the homework questions seemed kind of dry. Happily, I found this lesson plan on the Utah Education Network.




I didn't do part one of the lesson, which was making a triangle reference model to give a concrete picture of which sides correlate to which angle, although given more time, it may have been wise to do it.



We did part 2 and started part 3 in class. We'll have to finish part 3 next class. Normally, we would have been able to get through part 2 and 3 in one 80 minute period, but we had a quiz and went over it, so the 60ish minutes we had wasn't quite long enough.



I love the hands-on aspect of this lesson--that students are using the Law of Sines and Cosines to find the missing information in the triangle and then actually measuring with rulers and protractors to verify. When we moved onto part 3 I handed out half sheets of tablet paper and several of my students were working hard to make the hardest triangle to solve--as in with the smallest angle possible for one of the vertices. We had just made it to the part of the lesson where students give their constructed triangles with three measurements to other groups to solve when we ran out of time.  Ideally, if students are choosing three different measurements differently for each of their constructed triangles, the students solving them should get an assortment of Law of Sines and Cosines practice.


Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Mendelian Genetics with Fastplants, Corn on the Cob, and Sickle Cell Anemia



We've been increasing our repertoire of labs that students can do as we're talking about Mendelian and non-Mendelian genetics.


One of the labs that we've done for two years now is with Fastplants. This is another lab I use from Lee Ferguson and is on her website here under the Mendelian genetics link. Since I have small classes, I only buy one set of F2 seeds and all of the lab groups germinate the same type of seeds. Then we pool all of our data to analyze it. Last year, we used the F2 crosses of purple vs. green stems, and green vs. yellow leaves. We had a terrible time distinguishing the color of leaves since purple stems make the yellow leaves look greener, and green stems make the green leaves look lighter. Although we had great germination rates, our ratios were not even close to the expected. In our class discussion of our results, we decided it was due to the difficulty in distinguishing leaf color.


This year, I decided to go with green vs. purple stem and dwarf vs. normal height. My students were pretty excited about how well the seeds germinated and how as they sorted them by phenotype how close the numbers were to the expected values. They were pretty stoked about how small their chi-squared value was for our class data. I love it when they get excited about this kind of stuff! I think part of it is that they often complete labs with fairly high percent errors, and it's actually satisfying for results to go so well. They all agreed that this was a great variety of seeds to analyze. I'll be ordering this variety again next year.



Another lab that allows us to look at the ratio of phenotypes in a dihybrid cross involves looking at ears of corn. I went to an APSI this summer and one of the labs that I won was a class set of ears of corn from a dihybrid cross involving yellow vs. purple and smooth vs. wrinkled.


The lab we use to analyze the ears is from Biologycorner.com and you can find it here.

Another activity that I've added to our genetics unit is from HHMI Biointeractive. We do the activity titled Mendelian Genetics, Probability, Pedigree, and Chi-Square Statistics and the teacher and student materials can be found here. We watch the short film first, that is also found on that page, and move onto the questions. I like the introduction to sickle cell anemia since we'll revisit it when we get to the natural selection unit. 

Monday, January 6, 2020

Question Stacks in Precalculus

This year, I returned to teaching full time as I took on a Precalculus class. I have loved being back in the math classroom. I still teach AP and Honors Biology, but am excited to be doing some math as well.



Since I hadn't taught Precalculus in 21 years, I found a pre-made curriculum that was highly rated and to my delight, my school purchased the curriculum from All Things Algebra on Teachers Pay Teachers. I have been busy making activities to go along with the class, but I often use the questions from Gina's curriculum so that the activities fit well with the pre-made notes and homework that the students have. Alas, I can't share those activities with copyrighted information.

One of the activities that I have students do are question stacks. I love that they are self checking. I had read about them at the Math Equals Love blog here. Sarah provides a blank master copy to make them that work with printable business cards. I have loved using the business cards because I can just print, pop them out, and they are ready to go, no cutting needed.

So that I could share something, I went ahead and made a question stack for expanding and condensing logarithmic expressions using questions that weren't part of the curriculum. You can find the question stack here. Although it is in Word format, you should be able to open it as a google doc and it should work fine...at least it does for me.

Friday, January 3, 2020

Onion Mitosis Lab



One of the labs that I've come to enjoy while we are studying the cell cycle in AP Biology is the Onion Mitosis lab. I love this version of the lab because it requires very little prep time on my part, and within a week, my students have some real data to analyze. The lab I use with my students was modified from Lee Ferguson and can be found on her website, The Biology Space, here under the cell structure and function resources. 

It's hard to see, but we usually hold the onions up in the beakers by rubber banding them around a straw that sticks lower than the ends of the onions. That way the root bases aren't pushed against the bottom of the beaker.


I really only modified the materials that I provide the students to experiment with and how the results will be presented--since my students do a mini poster presentation of their results. The modified lab document can be found here.

The Gymnema Taste Lab and the Signal Transduction Pathway

When it comes to understanding cell communication and the signal transduction pathway, the Gymnema Tea Taste lab has become a class favorite. Of course, I first heard about this lab through my favorite source of ideas, the National AP Biology Teachers facebook group. You can find the write up for the lab at the Biology Corner here.

Last year, the lab happened to land on Grandparents' Day at our school. On that day, I not only had my students, but also many of their grandparents. I modified the lab to shorten it to the basics so I could hand the grandparents a one sheet lab that allowed them to also participate. This lab handout is here. The grandparents LOVED it! After the tasting, I handed students chalk markers to sketch out the signal transduction pathway on their tables with their grandparents.

I do think what tea you buy is important. The fist tea I bought did not work, but I've had great success with Buddha teas. I think part of the reason for success is having 100% gymnema sylvestra tea vs. just 48% gymnema.
This worked great for me, consistent results every time.

This did not work for me, even when I concentrated it.

One year, I had an exceptionally adventurous class. After they tried all of the foods I had provided in the lab, they went to their lunchboxes and tried bananas, strawberries and raspberries just to see what it would do with natural (unprocessed sugars). They were pleased to see that it really did work on fruits too. We also counted papillae after dying their tongues blue. As you can see in the picture, they were good sports about everything!